<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS Resolver Behavior in Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>News and Information About Microsoft ISA Server and Forefront Threat Management Gateway</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Living with ISA 2006 and the ISA Firewall client &#171; A glimpse into the life of IT</title>
		<link>http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Living with ISA 2006 and the ISA Firewall client &#171; A glimpse into the life of IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/?p=78#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] Vista and later workstations need a static route added for remote targets that were not web based.&#160; This can be done via DHCP.&#160; Thanks to some assistance from Richard Hicks and Microsoft for ultimately explaining the reason behind the inconnsistent behavior between XP and Vista.&#160; More info can be found here: http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista and later workstations need a static route added for remote targets that were not web based.&#160; This can be done via DHCP.&#160; Thanks to some assistance from Richard Hicks and Microsoft for ultimately explaining the reason behind the inconnsistent behavior between XP and Vista.&#160; More info can be found here: <a href="http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/&#160" rel="nofollow">http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/&#160</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Shinder Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista DNS Client Breaks &#34;Gateway-less&#34; Firewall Clients</title>
		<link>http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Shinder Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista DNS Client Breaks &#34;Gateway-less&#34; Firewall Clients</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/?p=78#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Hicks notes in his blog an interesting case of strange client behavior for machines with the Firewall client installed. As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hicks notes in his blog an interesting case of strange client behavior for machines with the Firewall client installed. As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
